Links


What they say

Stephen Archer is a speaker with great charisma. By using illustrations and personal experiences and not being afraid to share his own point of view of the current situation and who is to blame for it, he engages the whole audience, at the same time helping us all to understand the credit crunch a little better.

— Warwick Business School

Archives

UK and the EU. Leave, but its au revoir, not goodbye

10 justifications for leaving the EU

  1. 1. Global trade. Currently our overseas trade is tied to EU policy and trade agreements. These are not all bad but none add to our ability to compete wherever the UK wants to. Rather the opposite in many cases where our industries are bound up in the common interests of all EU members which is often not in the UK’s interest. To a large extent, the EU operates as a commune. Communes are notorious for fudged committee decisions and inefficiency; the EU is no exception. The UK is perfectly able and would be entitled to strike its own trade agreements around the world and given that the UK is the world’s 5th largest economy it is certain that most countries will want to trade with the UK. The UK is not a minnow and unlike 1973 it is not the sick man of Europe either. Trade with the EU will continue after Brexit and our competitiveness increase due to greater efficiencies. Currently the UK imports far more from the EU than it exports, indeed the EU is the UK’s single largest area of trade deficit.

2.Fiscal control and probity. The UK’s net payment to the EU is currently circa £10 billion pa. (£17b minus £7B rebate) If the UK left,  the EU would lose contributions of up to 8% of the EU budget, reason enough for them not to want to lose the UK. So whatever unseen or un-measured benefits there are to the UK they must exceed £10b to justify being in the EU.  No one has managed to quantify this benefit so in pure profit and loss terms we should exit. £10b pa left to spend within the UK can do quite a lot. Some would have to go to agriculture to keep it afloat but that would not be  a problem: Currently the UK contribution to EU agriculture is £6b and UK farmers get £3b back so Brexit should be very good for farmers if the UK treasury is allowed to support agriculture.

3. Fisheries. The UK can be self-sufficient in fish but the EU’s common fishery policy means that industrial trawlers from other nations come to our fishing grounds and deplete stock. Despite this the EU imposes quotas on the UK.

4. Legal authority. The UK has the finest legal system in the world and yet it is now subservient in most matters to a higher EU court. This adds cost, complexity and reduces the efficiency of the UK legal system.

5. Labour and migration. This is the political ‘hot potato’ but the issue of how the UK borders are controlled should be a sovereign right of the UK. The UK should have the choice of who should be allowed in and who not. This is not about xenophobia or stopping migration, it’s about common sense and  managing the population to match the infrastructure and capacity of the country.

6. Security and borders. With border control goes the opportunity to better control all movements and thus increase security. Given the global nature of security issues today, all security services are co-operating and will continue to do so. In addition, the UK belongs to NATO which is a more significant security organisation than the politically led EU defence body which has achieved little.

7. Inward investment. Outside the EU, the UK will be more efficient and yet geographically well placed to trade with Western and Eastern Europe. This will make the UK one of the most attractive nations for investors in industry and business.

8. De-regulation and waste reduction. The extent of a culture of bureaucracy has gripped the management of the EU is legendary. With too much time and money on their hands the bureaucrats have seemingly invented regulations because it is their job, not because they are a good idea. E.g. throwing away dead fish because they were caught and would exceed quota. in Europe and a broken currency union will ensure that Europe becomes less and less competitive as a trading block

9. The city and currency. To suggest that the city will be in some way isolated and disadvantaged by being outside the EU is to ignore the huge increase in globalisation over the past 40 years the power of globalisation exceeds the power of borders. Finance is far less governed by borders and more governed by global opportunity and free capital flows which are in turn is highly influenced by the fiscal framework. Outside the EU, the city as well as industry would be able to set tax and investment rules that are attractive to overseas investors and beneficial to the UK. The UK sits outside the Eurozone but the Euro currency is a badly broken model that will never be repaired and condemns southern Europe to centuries of hardship. Such a currency at the heart of the EU can only reduce the EU trading bloc’s ability to compete in the world.

10. Sovereignty. A huge number of decisions on UK policy are made by unelected and effectively unaccountable beauracrats. This is a fundamental flaw in the EU system but one that would be hard to fix. The EU is arguably too large, diverse and complex a body to be manageable. Leaving the EU would enable the UK to make its own policy decisions and do so through an elected body.


Share this post

Share


  • daznez

    excellent piece, sharing, thank you.

  • daznez

    excellent piece, sharing, thank you.

blog comments powered by Disqus